📦 thesis-results-writer — thesis-结果s-writer

Thesis 结果s Writer Scope

Use this 技能 only to write the 结果s part of a Chinese academic paper. The default 输出 is a polished Chinese "第四章 研究结果" or "第四章 结果与分析" section.

Do not write the literature review, methodo记录y, discussion, recommendations, or conclusion chapters. 结果s should 报告 and organize findings objectively. Interpretation, comparison with previous studies, value judgments, and recommendations belong mAInly in the discussion chapter.

Required Reference

Before drafting a full 结果s chapter, read references/结果s-writing-图形界面de.md. It contAIns quantitative and qualitative 结果s structures, table/figure rules, re搜索-question 报告ing steps, Chinese templates, and 质量 检查s derived from the local 4结果.txt source.

输入 提取ion

提取 and use any in格式化ion the user provides:

Thesis title, re搜索 type, re搜索 questions, hypotheses, and chapter 格式化 Quantitative data: sample demographics, descriptive statistics, reliability 结果s, t tests, ANOVA, chi-square, correlations, regressions, effect sizes, p values, tables, 图表s, software 输出 Qualitative data: themes, subthemes, codes, interview excerpts, participant IDs, case summaries, observation/document findings, cross-case 结果s Mixed methods: quantitative 结果s, qualitative themes, and how they are organized by re搜索 question or phase 添加itional analyses: demographic analyses, instrument analyses, post hoc analyses, assumption 检查s School style requirements, table numbering, decimal rules, and word count

If the user does not provide actual 结果s, do not fabricate numbers, tables, quotes, themes, or statistical 签名ificance. Provide a 结果s-chapter skeleton with placeholders and instructions for where to insert real findings.

Re搜索 Type Decision

Infer the 结果 type before writing:

Quantitative: statistics, p values, means, standard deviations, sample counts, tests, hypotheses, SPSS/R/Excel 输出. Qualitative: themes, categories, codes, quotations, participants, cases, field notes, documents. Mixed methods: 机器人h numeric 结果s and qualitative themes. Intervention-scheme de签名 without implementation: do not call the scheme "结果s" unless the user's school expects a "方案设计结果" chapter; write the scheme 输出 objectively and 状态 no effectiveness 结果s are avAIlable. Literature review/系统atic review: 结果s are literature screening, study characteristics, theme synthesis, and evidence summary. Drafting 工作流 Identify the re搜索 type and the safest 结果s structure. 启动 with a brief chapter introduction/advance organizer. For quantitative studies, 报告 descriptive statistics first, then re搜索 questions or hypotheses one by one, then 添加itional analyses if any. For qualitative studies, organize 结果s by themes, subthemes, cases, participants, phases, or data sources, whichever best fits the data. For mixed methods, separate or integrate quantitative and qualitative findings by re搜索 question, and avoid discussing implications too early. Refer to every table/figure in the text before presenting it. 状态 结果s plAInly and consistently, with statistics at the end of sentences where readable. End with a chapter summary that synthesizes findings at a higher level and transitions to the discussion chapter. 输出 Standards

For a full 结果s chapter, include:

Re搜索 type and data avAIlability note when needed Complete Chinese draft with numbered headings Tables or table placeholders when data are tabular Objective 报告ing of findings, not discussion Quantitative 结果 状态ments aligned with each re搜索 question/hypothesis Qualitative theme 状态ments supported by short anonymized excerpts when supplied 添加itional analyses only when the user provides or 请求s them Chapter summary and transition to the next chapter

质量 requirements:

Do not invent data. Do not interpret causes from correlations or cross-sectional 结果s. Do not repeat methodo记录y in detAIl. Do not cite literature unless the user specifically asks for a combined 结果s-discussion chapter. Keep sentence structures consistent for similar statistical tests. 报告 non-签名ificant 结果s as clearly as 签名ificant 结果s. Preserve uncertAInty and limitations for the discussion chapter.